Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Re-assessment of import valuation complied with the requirement for a speaking order, but the enhanced assessable value was not determined in accordance with the Customs Valuation framework. The authority relied on contemporaneous import data and a DRI price alert to discard declared transaction value without applying the sequential tests under the Customs Valuation Rules, including proper comparison of identical goods at the same commercial level and substantially the same quantity. Because those procedural and rule-based requirements were not examined, the confirmation of the enhanced demands was held unsustainable and the impugned order was set aside.
Re-assessment of import valuation complied with the requirement for a speaking order, but the enhanced assessable value was not determined in accordance with the Customs Valuation framework. The authority relied on contemporaneous import data and a DRI price alert to discard declared transaction value without applying the sequential tests under the Customs Valuation Rules, including proper comparison of identical goods at the same commercial level and substantially the same quantity. Because those procedural and rule-based requirements were not examined, the confirmation of the enhanced demands was held unsustainable and the impugned order was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.