Revisability of return invalidation communications under tax procedure affirmed, impugned non revisional finding quashed and matter remitted for fresh...
Transferable duty credit scrips validity and bona fide transferee entitlement to exemption upheld where scrips were subsisting at import, appeals allo...
Classification of knocked down motor vehicle component imports: Notification benefit denied because items are standalone non kit parts requiring subst...
Reassessment against a deceased assessee: procedural defect mandates fresh reassessment; nonresponsive petitioner may be treated as legal representati...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6461 to 6480 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Simultaneous insolvency proceedings may be initiated and admitted against a corporate debtor and its guarantor where statutory conditions for CIRP are met; the guarantor's liability being co-extensive with the principal supports parallel proceedings, subject to independent examination by the adjudicating authority. Creditors are not compelled to elect or apportion claims between debtor and guarantor because the doctrine of election does not apply absent mutually inconsistent remedies or express statutory mandate. Apprehensions of double enrichment do not bar parallel CIRP proceedings given obligations to update claims and the resolution professional's duty to assess and revise claims, and the adjudicating authority retains reasonable discretion on admission.
Simultaneous insolvency proceedings may be initiated and admitted against a corporate debtor and its guarantor where statutory conditions for CIRP are met; the guarantor's liability being co-extensive with the principal supports parallel proceedings, subject to independent examination by the adjudicating authority. Creditors are not compelled to elect or apportion claims between debtor and guarantor because the doctrine of election does not apply absent mutually inconsistent remedies or express statutory mandate. Apprehensions of double enrichment do not bar parallel CIRP proceedings given obligations to update claims and the resolution professional's duty to assess and revise claims, and the adjudicating authority retains reasonable discretion on admission.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
