Writ relief against show cause notices is available where jurisdiction is absent and concluded advance rulings cannot be reopened without fresh fraud ...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4221 to 4240 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Simultaneous insolvency proceedings may be initiated and admitted against a corporate debtor and its guarantor where statutory conditions for CIRP are met; the guarantor's liability being co-extensive with the principal supports parallel proceedings, subject to independent examination by the adjudicating authority. Creditors are not compelled to elect or apportion claims between debtor and guarantor because the doctrine of election does not apply absent mutually inconsistent remedies or express statutory mandate. Apprehensions of double enrichment do not bar parallel CIRP proceedings given obligations to update claims and the resolution professional's duty to assess and revise claims, and the adjudicating authority retains reasonable discretion on admission.
Simultaneous insolvency proceedings may be initiated and admitted against a corporate debtor and its guarantor where statutory conditions for CIRP are met; the guarantor's liability being co-extensive with the principal supports parallel proceedings, subject to independent examination by the adjudicating authority. Creditors are not compelled to elect or apportion claims between debtor and guarantor because the doctrine of election does not apply absent mutually inconsistent remedies or express statutory mandate. Apprehensions of double enrichment do not bar parallel CIRP proceedings given obligations to update claims and the resolution professional's duty to assess and revise claims, and the adjudicating authority retains reasonable discretion on admission.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
