Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Simultaneous insolvency proceedings may be initiated and admitted against a corporate debtor and its guarantor where statutory conditions for CIRP are met; the guarantor's liability being co-extensive with the principal supports parallel proceedings, subject to independent examination by the adjudicating authority. Creditors are not compelled to elect or apportion claims between debtor and guarantor because the doctrine of election does not apply absent mutually inconsistent remedies or express statutory mandate. Apprehensions of double enrichment do not bar parallel CIRP proceedings given obligations to update claims and the resolution professional's duty to assess and revise claims, and the adjudicating authority retains reasonable discretion on admission.
Simultaneous insolvency proceedings may be initiated and admitted against a corporate debtor and its guarantor where statutory conditions for CIRP are met; the guarantor's liability being co-extensive with the principal supports parallel proceedings, subject to independent examination by the adjudicating authority. Creditors are not compelled to elect or apportion claims between debtor and guarantor because the doctrine of election does not apply absent mutually inconsistent remedies or express statutory mandate. Apprehensions of double enrichment do not bar parallel CIRP proceedings given obligations to update claims and the resolution professional's duty to assess and revise claims, and the adjudicating authority retains reasonable discretion on admission.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
