Admissibility of inquiry statements and electronic printouts in customs adjudication requires witness examination and cross-examination before relianc...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6921 to 6940 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Procedural irregularity: returning a rebate application without specifying the exact defects violated the officer's duty to consider the claim and to afford opportunity to cure, rendering the return irregular and unsustainable. Documentary evidence versus form formalities: non-production of original/duplicate ARE 1 is a procedural, directory requirement; where contemporaneous shipping documents, verified copies, officer verification and CENVAT records establish export and duty payment, sanctioning the rebate is permissible and cannot be defeated solely by non-production of originals. Limitation: a claim initially filed within time but returned for defects relates back to the original filing date; re filing does not start a new limitation period.
Procedural irregularity: returning a rebate application without specifying the exact defects violated the officer's duty to consider the claim and to afford opportunity to cure, rendering the return irregular and unsustainable. Documentary evidence versus form formalities: non-production of original/duplicate ARE 1 is a procedural, directory requirement; where contemporaneous shipping documents, verified copies, officer verification and CENVAT records establish export and duty payment, sanctioning the rebate is permissible and cannot be defeated solely by non-production of originals. Limitation: a claim initially filed within time but returned for defects relates back to the original filing date; re filing does not start a new limitation period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
