Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
A Co operative Court award operates as a money decree enforceable like a civil decree, rendering the judgment debtor's property liable to attachment and sale; its executory effect could not be collaterally impugned once the order rejecting a belated set aside had become final. Revisionary jurisdiction under the statute is maintainable to examine confirmation of sale despite parallel rule remedies; the revisional forum may annul confirmation. Clauses (g) and (h) of Rule 107(11) impose a mandatory auction deposit regime, and failure to pay the balance within the prescribed period vitiated the sale confirmation. Remedy ordered: sale and confirmation set aside, fresh auction under Rule 107(11)(j), refund of purchaser's deposit with interest, rights to compromise preserved.
A Co operative Court award operates as a money decree enforceable like a civil decree, rendering the judgment debtor's property liable to attachment and sale; its executory effect could not be collaterally impugned once the order rejecting a belated set aside had become final. Revisionary jurisdiction under the statute is maintainable to examine confirmation of sale despite parallel rule remedies; the revisional forum may annul confirmation. Clauses (g) and (h) of Rule 107(11) impose a mandatory auction deposit regime, and failure to pay the balance within the prescribed period vitiated the sale confirmation. Remedy ordered: sale and confirmation set aside, fresh auction under Rule 107(11)(j), refund of purchaser's deposit with interest, rights to compromise preserved.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.