Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Assessee was required to file the statutory auditor report under the proviso applicable from the specified cut-off date for the assessment year 2022-23; mere submission of a CA certificate did not satisfy the audit-report requirement, and the assessee could not treat the proviso as retrospectively inapplicable for its convenience. Because the auditor report was not filed as prescribed, penalty for non-compliance was held justified and the appeal dismissed.
Assessee was required to file the statutory auditor report under the proviso applicable from the specified cut-off date for the assessment year 2022-23; mere submission of a CA certificate did not satisfy the audit-report requirement, and the assessee could not treat the proviso as retrospectively inapplicable for its convenience. Because the auditor report was not filed as prescribed, penalty for non-compliance was held justified and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.