Expenses for overseas film shooting treated as services availed outside India, so no reverse charge service tax liability; cenvat reversals and penalt...
Electricity consumptionbased clandestine production estimates under the repealed Central Excise Act found insufficient; demand quashed and appeals all...
Provisional attachment of the property was confirmed under the PBPT Act as the transaction falls within the scope of benami property under Section 2(9)(A); the appellant failed to explain sources of funds, did not produce original lease evidence and adverse inference was drawn for non-production, supporting IO findings of fabrication. Beneficial ownership remains under investigation-IO to re-investigate whether the beneficial owner includes the named individual, his son, and/or a company-so the property is not to be released. The Tribunal may modify AA orders under Section 46(4)(e); appeal by the benamidar is dismissed.
Provisional attachment of the property was confirmed under the PBPT Act as the transaction falls within the scope of benami property under Section 2(9)(A); the appellant failed to explain sources of funds, did not produce original lease evidence and adverse inference was drawn for non-production, supporting IO findings of fabrication. Beneficial ownership remains under investigation-IO to re-investigate whether the beneficial owner includes the named individual, his son, and/or a company-so the property is not to be released. The Tribunal may modify AA orders under Section 46(4)(e); appeal by the benamidar is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.