Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Provisional attachment of the property was confirmed under the PBPT Act as the transaction falls within the scope of benami property under Section 2(9)(A); the appellant failed to explain sources of funds, did not produce original lease evidence and adverse inference was drawn for non-production, supporting IO findings of fabrication. Beneficial ownership remains under investigation-IO to re-investigate whether the beneficial owner includes the named individual, his son, and/or a company-so the property is not to be released. The Tribunal may modify AA orders under Section 46(4)(e); appeal by the benamidar is dismissed.
Provisional attachment of the property was confirmed under the PBPT Act as the transaction falls within the scope of benami property under Section 2(9)(A); the appellant failed to explain sources of funds, did not produce original lease evidence and adverse inference was drawn for non-production, supporting IO findings of fabrication. Beneficial ownership remains under investigation-IO to re-investigate whether the beneficial owner includes the named individual, his son, and/or a company-so the property is not to be released. The Tribunal may modify AA orders under Section 46(4)(e); appeal by the benamidar is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
