Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6741 to 6760 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The note addresses re export permission conditioned on payment of a redemption fine and the statutory limitation for exercising that option. It explains that under the applicable statutory scheme the option to redeem lapses if the fine is not paid within the prescribed 120 day period and no appeal is pending, and that the prescribed appeal window (60 days plus 30 days extension) was not availed. Ignorance of the limitation provision was rejected. Operative effect: the redemption option was held to have lapsed, the writ was dismissed on merits, and the paid redemption fine was ordered refunded.
The note addresses re export permission conditioned on payment of a redemption fine and the statutory limitation for exercising that option. It explains that under the applicable statutory scheme the option to redeem lapses if the fine is not paid within the prescribed 120 day period and no appeal is pending, and that the prescribed appeal window (60 days plus 30 days extension) was not availed. Ignorance of the limitation provision was rejected. Operative effect: the redemption option was held to have lapsed, the writ was dismissed on merits, and the paid redemption fine was ordered refunded.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
