Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Appellate authority failed to apply independent mind by paraphrasing the adjudicating authority and neglecting the petitioner's explanations and documents on record; the HC found the appellate order uninformed and susceptible to judicial reproach. The court held that the appellate order does not reveal consideration of submissions or file documents and therefore set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for fresh merits consideration by the appellate authority, directing proper examination of the petitioner's grounds and documents on record.
Appellate authority failed to apply independent mind by paraphrasing the adjudicating authority and neglecting the petitioner's explanations and documents on record; the HC found the appellate order uninformed and susceptible to judicial reproach. The court held that the appellate order does not reveal consideration of submissions or file documents and therefore set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for fresh merits consideration by the appellate authority, directing proper examination of the petitioner's grounds and documents on record.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
