Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Application maintainability was questioned where the applicant initially failed to produce purchase and sales invoices and product brochure; the appellate power to confirm or modify an advance ruling exists but no merits determination was possible on the record. The applicant subsequently furnished invoices and offered further documents at hearing; those materials require factual verification and assessment for relevance. The appellate body set aside the impugned non maintainability ruling and remanded the matter to the Advance Ruling Authority for fresh examination and decision in light of the newly produced records.
Application maintainability was questioned where the applicant initially failed to produce purchase and sales invoices and product brochure; the appellate power to confirm or modify an advance ruling exists but no merits determination was possible on the record. The applicant subsequently furnished invoices and offered further documents at hearing; those materials require factual verification and assessment for relevance. The appellate body set aside the impugned non maintainability ruling and remanded the matter to the Advance Ruling Authority for fresh examination and decision in light of the newly produced records.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.