International transaction characterisation of domestic divestment of support services business rejected; transaction between resident associated enter...
Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6841 to 6860 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessee claimed excess deduction under income from house property and received an excess refund; assessee voluntarily deposited the excess refund with interest and filed revised computations before issuance of notice u/s.148. Tribunal applied the principle that voluntary deposit of tax and interest prior to issuance of notice and disclosure of correct income in revised returns negates the basis for imposing penalty; accordingly the penalties under 271(1)(c) and 270A were deleted on the facts and in line with prior similar decisions where the excess refund was repaid before notice.
Assessee claimed excess deduction under income from house property and received an excess refund; assessee voluntarily deposited the excess refund with interest and filed revised computations before issuance of notice u/s.148. Tribunal applied the principle that voluntary deposit of tax and interest prior to issuance of notice and disclosure of correct income in revised returns negates the basis for imposing penalty; accordingly the penalties under 271(1)(c) and 270A were deleted on the facts and in line with prior similar decisions where the excess refund was repaid before notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
