Expenses for overseas film shooting treated as services availed outside India, so no reverse charge service tax liability; cenvat reversals and penalt...
Electricity consumptionbased clandestine production estimates under the repealed Central Excise Act found insufficient; demand quashed and appeals all...
Assessee claimed excess deduction under income from house property and received an excess refund; assessee voluntarily deposited the excess refund with interest and filed revised computations before issuance of notice u/s.148. Tribunal applied the principle that voluntary deposit of tax and interest prior to issuance of notice and disclosure of correct income in revised returns negates the basis for imposing penalty; accordingly the penalties under 271(1)(c) and 270A were deleted on the facts and in line with prior similar decisions where the excess refund was repaid before notice.
Assessee claimed excess deduction under income from house property and received an excess refund; assessee voluntarily deposited the excess refund with interest and filed revised computations before issuance of notice u/s.148. Tribunal applied the principle that voluntary deposit of tax and interest prior to issuance of notice and disclosure of correct income in revised returns negates the basis for imposing penalty; accordingly the penalties under 271(1)(c) and 270A were deleted on the facts and in line with prior similar decisions where the excess refund was repaid before notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
