Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Assessee claimed excess deduction under income from house property and received an excess refund; assessee voluntarily deposited the excess refund with interest and filed revised computations before issuance of notice u/s.148. Tribunal applied the principle that voluntary deposit of tax and interest prior to issuance of notice and disclosure of correct income in revised returns negates the basis for imposing penalty; accordingly the penalties under 271(1)(c) and 270A were deleted on the facts and in line with prior similar decisions where the excess refund was repaid before notice.
Assessee claimed excess deduction under income from house property and received an excess refund; assessee voluntarily deposited the excess refund with interest and filed revised computations before issuance of notice u/s.148. Tribunal applied the principle that voluntary deposit of tax and interest prior to issuance of notice and disclosure of correct income in revised returns negates the basis for imposing penalty; accordingly the penalties under 271(1)(c) and 270A were deleted on the facts and in line with prior similar decisions where the excess refund was repaid before notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
