Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
Results declared by the assessee in the return were held unsupported by the books of accounts, and the rejection of the books and consequent income estimation was sustained. A cash deposit during the demonetisation period was held to be explained by retail liquor sales and, since sales were accepted as the source and no other unrecorded utilisation appeared, an addition under unexplained money principles was deleted. A claimed deduction under 80C was disallowed for want of documentary proof; absence of supporting evidence before appellate authorities justified upholding that disallowance.
Results declared by the assessee in the return were held unsupported by the books of accounts, and the rejection of the books and consequent income estimation was sustained. A cash deposit during the demonetisation period was held to be explained by retail liquor sales and, since sales were accepted as the source and no other unrecorded utilisation appeared, an addition under unexplained money principles was deleted. A claimed deduction under 80C was disallowed for want of documentary proof; absence of supporting evidence before appellate authorities justified upholding that disallowance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
