Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Mandatory BIS registration for specified electrical imports was held to be a procedural requirement whose superseding Quality Control Order operates prospectively, so there was no retrospective obligation at import; the superseding order deferred registration and expressly excluded prior acts. Because the breach was procedural and there was no mens rea by the importer, confiscation and penalty were deemed unwarranted. The operative relief ordered was payment of a redemption fine of Rs. 15,000 and release of the goods on payment within one week of receiving the certified order.
Mandatory BIS registration for specified electrical imports was held to be a procedural requirement whose superseding Quality Control Order operates prospectively, so there was no retrospective obligation at import; the superseding order deferred registration and expressly excluded prior acts. Because the breach was procedural and there was no mens rea by the importer, confiscation and penalty were deemed unwarranted. The operative relief ordered was payment of a redemption fine of Rs. 15,000 and release of the goods on payment within one week of receiving the certified order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.