Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Differential duty under the EPCG Notification No.28/97 was held payable in principle in terms of the bond, but the demand was quashed and remitted for re computation because the adjudicating authority confirmed demand without hearing the appellant and without considering pending requests to include third party exports, duty calculation on depreciated value of capital goods, and permissible intervening exports. Confiscation under the Customs non observance provision is unsustainable where the competent authority subsequently extended the export obligation period, thereby regularising earlier non observance; consequently confiscation of capital goods and the related penalty are set aside. Appeal allowed in part and demand remanded.
Differential duty under the EPCG Notification No.28/97 was held payable in principle in terms of the bond, but the demand was quashed and remitted for re computation because the adjudicating authority confirmed demand without hearing the appellant and without considering pending requests to include third party exports, duty calculation on depreciated value of capital goods, and permissible intervening exports. Confiscation under the Customs non observance provision is unsustainable where the competent authority subsequently extended the export obligation period, thereby regularising earlier non observance; consequently confiscation of capital goods and the related penalty are set aside. Appeal allowed in part and demand remanded.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.