Admissibility of inquiry statements and electronic printouts in customs adjudication requires witness examination and cross-examination before relianc...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6921 to 6940 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Differential duty under the EPCG Notification No.28/97 was held payable in principle in terms of the bond, but the demand was quashed and remitted for re computation because the adjudicating authority confirmed demand without hearing the appellant and without considering pending requests to include third party exports, duty calculation on depreciated value of capital goods, and permissible intervening exports. Confiscation under the Customs non observance provision is unsustainable where the competent authority subsequently extended the export obligation period, thereby regularising earlier non observance; consequently confiscation of capital goods and the related penalty are set aside. Appeal allowed in part and demand remanded.
Differential duty under the EPCG Notification No.28/97 was held payable in principle in terms of the bond, but the demand was quashed and remitted for re computation because the adjudicating authority confirmed demand without hearing the appellant and without considering pending requests to include third party exports, duty calculation on depreciated value of capital goods, and permissible intervening exports. Confiscation under the Customs non observance provision is unsustainable where the competent authority subsequently extended the export obligation period, thereby regularising earlier non observance; consequently confiscation of capital goods and the related penalty are set aside. Appeal allowed in part and demand remanded.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
