CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Straight-line lease rental accounting change results in penalty quashed where disclosed accounts and bona fide arguable accounting interpretation exis...
High Court found the petitioner's statutory replies to Form GST DRC-01 notices inadequate, holding that mere production of voluminous documents does not negate alleged excess input tax claims. The Court required tabulation and reconciliation of bank statement entries with monthly GSTR-3B returns and annual GSTR-9/9C filings, and granted one opportunity for a clarified reply. Matters were remitted for fresh adjudication on merits, conditioned on the petitioner making a pre-deposit of Rs. 35,00,000 from its Electronic Cash Register within 30 days; bank attachment will be lifted on compliance and recovery proceedings are stayed during the compliance period.
High Court found the petitioner's statutory replies to Form GST DRC-01 notices inadequate, holding that mere production of voluminous documents does not negate alleged excess input tax claims. The Court required tabulation and reconciliation of bank statement entries with monthly GSTR-3B returns and annual GSTR-9/9C filings, and granted one opportunity for a clarified reply. Matters were remitted for fresh adjudication on merits, conditioned on the petitioner making a pre-deposit of Rs. 35,00,000 from its Electronic Cash Register within 30 days; bank attachment will be lifted on compliance and recovery proceedings are stayed during the compliance period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
