Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Remand required for fresh adjudication of tax demands arising from admitted reverse charge mechanism liability and disputed input tax credit (ITC) reversal; the commentary stresses that although Section 42 (ITC reversal) was later deleted by Finance Act, 2022, the effect of that repeal on past liabilities and entitlement to retrospective benefit must be considered on merits. Petitioner had sought time but failed to challenge an excess ITC demand, which was confirmed; bank attachment is ordered lifted conditionally upon deposit of the tax liability and no other arrears, with liberty to recover if stipulated compliance fails.
Remand required for fresh adjudication of tax demands arising from admitted reverse charge mechanism liability and disputed input tax credit (ITC) reversal; the commentary stresses that although Section 42 (ITC reversal) was later deleted by Finance Act, 2022, the effect of that repeal on past liabilities and entitlement to retrospective benefit must be considered on merits. Petitioner had sought time but failed to challenge an excess ITC demand, which was confirmed; bank attachment is ordered lifted conditionally upon deposit of the tax liability and no other arrears, with liberty to recover if stipulated compliance fails.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
