Business deductions and transfer pricing issues: tribunal treatment of software write-offs, donation receipts, warranty provisions, and related expens...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2921 to 2940 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Remand required for fresh adjudication of tax demands arising from admitted reverse charge mechanism liability and disputed input tax credit (ITC) reversal; the commentary stresses that although Section 42 (ITC reversal) was later deleted by Finance Act, 2022, the effect of that repeal on past liabilities and entitlement to retrospective benefit must be considered on merits. Petitioner had sought time but failed to challenge an excess ITC demand, which was confirmed; bank attachment is ordered lifted conditionally upon deposit of the tax liability and no other arrears, with liberty to recover if stipulated compliance fails.
Remand required for fresh adjudication of tax demands arising from admitted reverse charge mechanism liability and disputed input tax credit (ITC) reversal; the commentary stresses that although Section 42 (ITC reversal) was later deleted by Finance Act, 2022, the effect of that repeal on past liabilities and entitlement to retrospective benefit must be considered on merits. Petitioner had sought time but failed to challenge an excess ITC demand, which was confirmed; bank attachment is ordered lifted conditionally upon deposit of the tax liability and no other arrears, with liberty to recover if stipulated compliance fails.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
