Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Remand required for fresh adjudication of tax demands arising from admitted reverse charge mechanism liability and disputed input tax credit (ITC) reversal; the commentary stresses that although Section 42 (ITC reversal) was later deleted by Finance Act, 2022, the effect of that repeal on past liabilities and entitlement to retrospective benefit must be considered on merits. Petitioner had sought time but failed to challenge an excess ITC demand, which was confirmed; bank attachment is ordered lifted conditionally upon deposit of the tax liability and no other arrears, with liberty to recover if stipulated compliance fails.
Remand required for fresh adjudication of tax demands arising from admitted reverse charge mechanism liability and disputed input tax credit (ITC) reversal; the commentary stresses that although Section 42 (ITC reversal) was later deleted by Finance Act, 2022, the effect of that repeal on past liabilities and entitlement to retrospective benefit must be considered on merits. Petitioner had sought time but failed to challenge an excess ITC demand, which was confirmed; bank attachment is ordered lifted conditionally upon deposit of the tax liability and no other arrears, with liberty to recover if stipulated compliance fails.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
