Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Order sets aside impugned adjudication and remits the matter for fresh merit determination, directing the respondent to take into account the State Authority's order for the same tax period. Petitioner must particularize each pre GST transaction alleged to have been subject to Service Tax/VAT, substantiate claims with annexures (mere filing inadequate), and file a proper reply treating the prior Order in Original as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice within thirty days. A personal hearing is to be afforded before any final order is passed.
Order sets aside impugned adjudication and remits the matter for fresh merit determination, directing the respondent to take into account the State Authority's order for the same tax period. Petitioner must particularize each pre GST transaction alleged to have been subject to Service Tax/VAT, substantiate claims with annexures (mere filing inadequate), and file a proper reply treating the prior Order in Original as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice within thirty days. A personal hearing is to be afforded before any final order is passed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.