Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The ruling determines that bundled sale of printing inks and various consumables is not a composite supply because the bundle is not 'naturally bundled' nor does any single good qualify as the 'principal supply'; instead the package is a mixed supply and taxable accordingly. The supply is a continuous supply with periodic invoicing; time of supply is the earlier of invoice date or payment under Section 12(2). Transaction value is the per-click/per-impression amount stated in the invoice and governs valuation under Section 15.
The ruling determines that bundled sale of printing inks and various consumables is not a composite supply because the bundle is not 'naturally bundled' nor does any single good qualify as the 'principal supply'; instead the package is a mixed supply and taxable accordingly. The supply is a continuous supply with periodic invoicing; time of supply is the earlier of invoice date or payment under Section 12(2). Transaction value is the per-click/per-impression amount stated in the invoice and governs valuation under Section 15.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.