Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Dispute concerned entitlement to deduction under Section 80IC for an Uttarakhand unit: tribunal held the unit's conversion of electrical steel into graded laminations and assembly of an integrated cooling module amounted to 'manufacture' because a commercially distinct commodity with distinct end-use emerged, applying the distinct-commodity test. Prior precedents on transformation and design supported manufacture. The tribunal found no evidence that the unit was formed by splitting-up or reconstruction of existing business and inter-unit transfers were at arm's length; consequently the unit met the conditions of Section 80IC(2)(a) and was not barred by Section 80IC(4)(i), and the assessing officer's disallowance was deleted.
Dispute concerned entitlement to deduction under Section 80IC for an Uttarakhand unit: tribunal held the unit's conversion of electrical steel into graded laminations and assembly of an integrated cooling module amounted to 'manufacture' because a commercially distinct commodity with distinct end-use emerged, applying the distinct-commodity test. Prior precedents on transformation and design supported manufacture. The tribunal found no evidence that the unit was formed by splitting-up or reconstruction of existing business and inter-unit transfers were at arm's length; consequently the unit met the conditions of Section 80IC(2)(a) and was not barred by Section 80IC(4)(i), and the assessing officer's disallowance was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
