Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment must be founded on recorded satisfaction...
Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assessment.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Reopening of assessment must be founded on recorded satisfaction that seized material relates to the assessee when that material was seized from a third person; the assessing officer must demonstrate nexus between the seized material and escapement of income and obtain requisite jurisdictional approval before issuing notice. Where the AO treated third party search material as if searched in the assessee's premises, relied on employee laptop and pen drive data without satisfying the statutory preconditions or proving nexus, the notice under reopening provision and resulting assessment are void and liable to be quashed.
Reopening of assessment must be founded on recorded satisfaction that seized material relates to the assessee when that material was seized from a third person; the assessing officer must demonstrate nexus between the seized material and escapement of income and obtain requisite jurisdictional approval before issuing notice. Where the AO treated third party search material as if searched in the assessee's premises, relied on employee laptop and pen drive data without satisfying the statutory preconditions or proving nexus, the notice under reopening provision and resulting assessment are void and liable to be quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.