Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6541 to 6560 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment must be founded on recorded satisfaction...
Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assessment.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Reopening of assessment must be founded on recorded satisfaction that seized material relates to the assessee when that material was seized from a third person; the assessing officer must demonstrate nexus between the seized material and escapement of income and obtain requisite jurisdictional approval before issuing notice. Where the AO treated third party search material as if searched in the assessee's premises, relied on employee laptop and pen drive data without satisfying the statutory preconditions or proving nexus, the notice under reopening provision and resulting assessment are void and liable to be quashed.
Reopening of assessment must be founded on recorded satisfaction that seized material relates to the assessee when that material was seized from a third person; the assessing officer must demonstrate nexus between the seized material and escapement of income and obtain requisite jurisdictional approval before issuing notice. Where the AO treated third party search material as if searched in the assessee's premises, relied on employee laptop and pen drive data without satisfying the statutory preconditions or proving nexus, the notice under reopening provision and resulting assessment are void and liable to be quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.