Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Cross country pipeline classification and ITC entitlement: pipelines outside factory treated as immovable, ITC disallowed under Section 17 restriction...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6181 to 6200 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment must be founded on recorded satisfaction...
Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assessment.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Reopening of assessment must be founded on recorded satisfaction that seized material relates to the assessee when that material was seized from a third person; the assessing officer must demonstrate nexus between the seized material and escapement of income and obtain requisite jurisdictional approval before issuing notice. Where the AO treated third party search material as if searched in the assessee's premises, relied on employee laptop and pen drive data without satisfying the statutory preconditions or proving nexus, the notice under reopening provision and resulting assessment are void and liable to be quashed.
Reopening of assessment must be founded on recorded satisfaction that seized material relates to the assessee when that material was seized from a third person; the assessing officer must demonstrate nexus between the seized material and escapement of income and obtain requisite jurisdictional approval before issuing notice. Where the AO treated third party search material as if searched in the assessee's premises, relied on employee laptop and pen drive data without satisfying the statutory preconditions or proving nexus, the notice under reopening provision and resulting assessment are void and liable to be quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.