Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Provisional release of imported goods was allowed against a bank guarantee securing differential duty where petitioners claimed preferential tariff treatment under CAROTAR and supplier furnished origin confirmations and cooperation; HC found no adjudicatory proceedings initiated and no conclusive adverse material since 2018, so denial of provisional release was unjustified. The court reasoned that potential departmental recovery of full customs duty would be adequately secured by the bank guarantee and that verification of origin can proceed without continuing detention; writ petitions disposed granting relief for provisional release.
Provisional release of imported goods was allowed against a bank guarantee securing differential duty where petitioners claimed preferential tariff treatment under CAROTAR and supplier furnished origin confirmations and cooperation; HC found no adjudicatory proceedings initiated and no conclusive adverse material since 2018, so denial of provisional release was unjustified. The court reasoned that potential departmental recovery of full customs duty would be adequately secured by the bank guarantee and that verification of origin can proceed without continuing detention; writ petitions disposed granting relief for provisional release.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.