Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The note addresses exclusion of the limitation period during the...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invocation.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The note addresses exclusion of the limitation period during the pandemic and its effect on a petition based on a corporate guarantee. It applies the Supreme Court direction excluding a defined pandemic interval from limitation computation and treats an out of court acknowledgement by the principal debtor as extending limitation under the Limitation Act acknowledgement rule, with corresponding effect for the guarantor. Whether guarantee invocation occurred by issuing a statutory demand notice is fact specific and depends on the guarantee deed; the adjudicating authority failed to consider these aspects properly, so the matter is remanded for fresh factual and legal determination.
The note addresses exclusion of the limitation period during the pandemic and its effect on a petition based on a corporate guarantee. It applies the Supreme Court direction excluding a defined pandemic interval from limitation computation and treats an out of court acknowledgement by the principal debtor as extending limitation under the Limitation Act acknowledgement rule, with corresponding effect for the guarantor. Whether guarantee invocation occurred by issuing a statutory demand notice is fact specific and depends on the guarantee deed; the adjudicating authority failed to consider these aspects properly, so the matter is remanded for fresh factual and legal determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.