Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The note addresses exclusion of the limitation period during the...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invocation.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The note addresses exclusion of the limitation period during the pandemic and its effect on a petition based on a corporate guarantee. It applies the Supreme Court direction excluding a defined pandemic interval from limitation computation and treats an out of court acknowledgement by the principal debtor as extending limitation under the Limitation Act acknowledgement rule, with corresponding effect for the guarantor. Whether guarantee invocation occurred by issuing a statutory demand notice is fact specific and depends on the guarantee deed; the adjudicating authority failed to consider these aspects properly, so the matter is remanded for fresh factual and legal determination.
The note addresses exclusion of the limitation period during the pandemic and its effect on a petition based on a corporate guarantee. It applies the Supreme Court direction excluding a defined pandemic interval from limitation computation and treats an out of court acknowledgement by the principal debtor as extending limitation under the Limitation Act acknowledgement rule, with corresponding effect for the guarantor. Whether guarantee invocation occurred by issuing a statutory demand notice is fact specific and depends on the guarantee deed; the adjudicating authority failed to consider these aspects properly, so the matter is remanded for fresh factual and legal determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
