NPCI-based bank account validation for IEC applications and modifications enables real-time validation; incorrect details block submission or trigger ...
Creation/Invocation of pledge of securities through depository system: standardized pledge forms, notice requirement and invocation notifications to p...
Calendar Spread margin benefit for Single Stock Derivatives suspended on expiry day for expiring contracts; exchanges must implement systems and rule ...
Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
The note addresses exclusion of the limitation period during the...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invocation.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The note addresses exclusion of the limitation period during the pandemic and its effect on a petition based on a corporate guarantee. It applies the Supreme Court direction excluding a defined pandemic interval from limitation computation and treats an out of court acknowledgement by the principal debtor as extending limitation under the Limitation Act acknowledgement rule, with corresponding effect for the guarantor. Whether guarantee invocation occurred by issuing a statutory demand notice is fact specific and depends on the guarantee deed; the adjudicating authority failed to consider these aspects properly, so the matter is remanded for fresh factual and legal determination.
The note addresses exclusion of the limitation period during the pandemic and its effect on a petition based on a corporate guarantee. It applies the Supreme Court direction excluding a defined pandemic interval from limitation computation and treats an out of court acknowledgement by the principal debtor as extending limitation under the Limitation Act acknowledgement rule, with corresponding effect for the guarantor. Whether guarantee invocation occurred by issuing a statutory demand notice is fact specific and depends on the guarantee deed; the adjudicating authority failed to consider these aspects properly, so the matter is remanded for fresh factual and legal determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.