Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
Petitioner challenged confirmation of a show-cause proposal for reversal of erroneously availed Input Tax Credit; court noted petitioner purportedly reversed the ineligible credit and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication to determine whether interest and penalty are payable. The court directed the respondent to apply the post Finance Act 2022 amendment limiting interest under Section 50 to the cash component of tax and to reconsider penalty liability under the GST enactments (penalty provision invoked in the impugned order). Petitioner must file a reply with documents to the show-cause within 30 days; writ petition disposed accordingly.
Petitioner challenged confirmation of a show-cause proposal for reversal of erroneously availed Input Tax Credit; court noted petitioner purportedly reversed the ineligible credit and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication to determine whether interest and penalty are payable. The court directed the respondent to apply the post Finance Act 2022 amendment limiting interest under Section 50 to the cash component of tax and to reconsider penalty liability under the GST enactments (penalty provision invoked in the impugned order). Petitioner must file a reply with documents to the show-cause within 30 days; writ petition disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
