Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Petitioner challenged confirmation of a show-cause proposal for reversal of erroneously availed Input Tax Credit; court noted petitioner purportedly reversed the ineligible credit and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication to determine whether interest and penalty are payable. The court directed the respondent to apply the post Finance Act 2022 amendment limiting interest under Section 50 to the cash component of tax and to reconsider penalty liability under the GST enactments (penalty provision invoked in the impugned order). Petitioner must file a reply with documents to the show-cause within 30 days; writ petition disposed accordingly.
Petitioner challenged confirmation of a show-cause proposal for reversal of erroneously availed Input Tax Credit; court noted petitioner purportedly reversed the ineligible credit and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication to determine whether interest and penalty are payable. The court directed the respondent to apply the post Finance Act 2022 amendment limiting interest under Section 50 to the cash component of tax and to reconsider penalty liability under the GST enactments (penalty provision invoked in the impugned order). Petitioner must file a reply with documents to the show-cause within 30 days; writ petition disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
