Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Statutory time bar in assessment law prevented reopening where no fresh assessment was passed within the period prescribed, and after an almost nine year lapse by Revenue following an ITAT order the HC held the assessment time barred and directed release of seized jewellery to the petitioner within six weeks. An intervenor's application seeking return of Stridhan was dismissed for lack of locus in this petition; the intervenor was permitted to pursue independent proceedings for any proprietary claim against the petitioner.
Statutory time bar in assessment law prevented reopening where no fresh assessment was passed within the period prescribed, and after an almost nine year lapse by Revenue following an ITAT order the HC held the assessment time barred and directed release of seized jewellery to the petitioner within six weeks. An intervenor's application seeking return of Stridhan was dismissed for lack of locus in this petition; the intervenor was permitted to pursue independent proceedings for any proprietary claim against the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.