Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Statutory time bar in assessment law prevented reopening where no fresh assessment was passed within the period prescribed, and after an almost nine year lapse by Revenue following an ITAT order the HC held the assessment time barred and directed release of seized jewellery to the petitioner within six weeks. An intervenor's application seeking return of Stridhan was dismissed for lack of locus in this petition; the intervenor was permitted to pursue independent proceedings for any proprietary claim against the petitioner.
Statutory time bar in assessment law prevented reopening where no fresh assessment was passed within the period prescribed, and after an almost nine year lapse by Revenue following an ITAT order the HC held the assessment time barred and directed release of seized jewellery to the petitioner within six weeks. An intervenor's application seeking return of Stridhan was dismissed for lack of locus in this petition; the intervenor was permitted to pursue independent proceedings for any proprietary claim against the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.