CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Straight-line lease rental accounting change results in penalty quashed where disclosed accounts and bona fide arguable accounting interpretation exis...
Refund of tax deducted at source on compensation paid for land acquired under the National Highways Act was contested; the High Court found the writ petition advanced on misleading and misrepresented facts and concluded the petitioner sought a second refund despite knowledge of an earlier credit. The court therefore set aside the Single Judge's order that had granted relief, on grounds of misrepresentation and abuse of judicial process, and imposed substantial costs on the petitioner to sanction the conduct and deter repetition.
Refund of tax deducted at source on compensation paid for land acquired under the National Highways Act was contested; the High Court found the writ petition advanced on misleading and misrepresented facts and concluded the petitioner sought a second refund despite knowledge of an earlier credit. The court therefore set aside the Single Judge's order that had granted relief, on grounds of misrepresentation and abuse of judicial process, and imposed substantial costs on the petitioner to sanction the conduct and deter repetition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
