Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Refund of tax deducted at source on compensation paid for land acquired under the National Highways Act was contested; the High Court found the writ petition advanced on misleading and misrepresented facts and concluded the petitioner sought a second refund despite knowledge of an earlier credit. The court therefore set aside the Single Judge's order that had granted relief, on grounds of misrepresentation and abuse of judicial process, and imposed substantial costs on the petitioner to sanction the conduct and deter repetition.
Refund of tax deducted at source on compensation paid for land acquired under the National Highways Act was contested; the High Court found the writ petition advanced on misleading and misrepresented facts and concluded the petitioner sought a second refund despite knowledge of an earlier credit. The court therefore set aside the Single Judge's order that had granted relief, on grounds of misrepresentation and abuse of judicial process, and imposed substantial costs on the petitioner to sanction the conduct and deter repetition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
