Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5081 to 5100 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of tax deducted at source on compensation paid for land acquired under the National Highways Act was contested; the High Court found the writ petition advanced on misleading and misrepresented facts and concluded the petitioner sought a second refund despite knowledge of an earlier credit. The court therefore set aside the Single Judge's order that had granted relief, on grounds of misrepresentation and abuse of judicial process, and imposed substantial costs on the petitioner to sanction the conduct and deter repetition.
Refund of tax deducted at source on compensation paid for land acquired under the National Highways Act was contested; the High Court found the writ petition advanced on misleading and misrepresented facts and concluded the petitioner sought a second refund despite knowledge of an earlier credit. The court therefore set aside the Single Judge's order that had granted relief, on grounds of misrepresentation and abuse of judicial process, and imposed substantial costs on the petitioner to sanction the conduct and deter repetition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
