Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Verification showed the seized jewellery were not held as benami by the alleged benamidar; subsequent provenance submissions and disclosures were accepted as genuine, including aggregate disclosure by the related person of funds and sales proceeds. The Tribunal applied provenance and verification evidence to reject the benami characterisation and held that the provisional attachment under the PBPTA could not be sustained; accordingly the attachment was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Verification showed the seized jewellery were not held as benami by the alleged benamidar; subsequent provenance submissions and disclosures were accepted as genuine, including aggregate disclosure by the related person of funds and sales proceeds. The Tribunal applied provenance and verification evidence to reject the benami characterisation and held that the provisional attachment under the PBPTA could not be sustained; accordingly the attachment was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
