Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process is permissible despite pending Company Court proceedings where statutory timelines for a Scheme of Arrangement were missed; the Rules of 2016 required transfer of unresolved second-motion proceedings to the Tribunal, and a belated unacted application is incompetent and should have been transferred. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code prevails over inconsistent provisions of the Companies Act, permitting CIRP priority and appointment and powers of an Interim Resolution Professional during moratorium. A scheme or compromise may still be considered within an IBC proceeding at the appropriate stage; the appellate order was set aside and the Tribunal's CIRP direction restored.
Initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process is permissible despite pending Company Court proceedings where statutory timelines for a Scheme of Arrangement were missed; the Rules of 2016 required transfer of unresolved second-motion proceedings to the Tribunal, and a belated unacted application is incompetent and should have been transferred. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code prevails over inconsistent provisions of the Companies Act, permitting CIRP priority and appointment and powers of an Interim Resolution Professional during moratorium. A scheme or compromise may still be considered within an IBC proceeding at the appropriate stage; the appellate order was set aside and the Tribunal's CIRP direction restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
