Condonation of Delay denied: communication lapses and corporate restructuring found insufficient; prolonged inaction and lack of bona fides led to ref...
Export Support intervention INSIGHT launched to provide non financial capacity building, trade intelligence and pilot support with defined funding and...
The Court held that modification or waiver of a debenture trust deed required compliance with its express written-waiver procedure, so unilateral communications with a single debenture holder cannot bind absent the prescribed written document; estoppel against other debenture holders thus failed. The debenture trustee's duty is to protect debenture holders' interests, and adverse findings of collusion were unsupported. Concurrent findings by NCLT/NCLAT were interfered with for perversity where they reframed the DTD on conjecture. The petition by the debenture trustee under Section 7 was held to be admitable.
The Court held that modification or waiver of a debenture trust deed required compliance with its express written-waiver procedure, so unilateral communications with a single debenture holder cannot bind absent the prescribed written document; estoppel against other debenture holders thus failed. The debenture trustee's duty is to protect debenture holders' interests, and adverse findings of collusion were unsupported. Concurrent findings by NCLT/NCLAT were interfered with for perversity where they reframed the DTD on conjecture. The petition by the debenture trustee under Section 7 was held to be admitable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.