Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal held that an approved resolution plan, restored and implemented prior to the impugned order, carries binding effect and precludes inconsistent adverse action; accordingly claims not incorporated in the sanctioned plan are extinguished to the extent the plan governs creditor treatment. The tribunal relied on a prior higher-court precedent restoring plan approval and concluded the impugned administrative order could not stand; the impugned order was set aside and the appellant company's appeal allowed, with pending applications disposed of accordingly.
The Appellate Tribunal held that an approved resolution plan, restored and implemented prior to the impugned order, carries binding effect and precludes inconsistent adverse action; accordingly claims not incorporated in the sanctioned plan are extinguished to the extent the plan governs creditor treatment. The tribunal relied on a prior higher-court precedent restoring plan approval and concluded the impugned administrative order could not stand; the impugned order was set aside and the appellant company's appeal allowed, with pending applications disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.