Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Petitioner's refund claim was remitted to the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax West Bengal & Sikkim to nominate a competent officer (Commissioner rank or above) to conduct an enquiry and decide the refund claim in accordance with law; the officer must issue notice to the petitioner within one week and hear its case. The court directed that if the petitioner is entitled to a refund it must not be denied, while emphasising the petitioner's obligation to maintain supporting documents and the department's responsibility to consider available records. Affidavits were not ordered.
Petitioner's refund claim was remitted to the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax West Bengal & Sikkim to nominate a competent officer (Commissioner rank or above) to conduct an enquiry and decide the refund claim in accordance with law; the officer must issue notice to the petitioner within one week and hear its case. The court directed that if the petitioner is entitled to a refund it must not be denied, while emphasising the petitioner's obligation to maintain supporting documents and the department's responsibility to consider available records. Affidavits were not ordered.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.