Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6741 to 6760 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment was upheld where impounded loose papers and a purchaser's admission provided prima facie material of undisclosed cash consideration, corroborated by matching cheque entries and registered sale deeds; failure of the assessee to specifically seek cross examination at reassessment foreclosed a later natural justice challenge. The impounded documents were treated as reliable corroborative evidence rather than vague papers, and the existence of substantial disparity between recorded and apparent market value reinforced inference of on money. On these grounds the assessing officer's addition as unaccounted sale consideration was held justified and the claim against reassessment failed.
Reopening of assessment was upheld where impounded loose papers and a purchaser's admission provided prima facie material of undisclosed cash consideration, corroborated by matching cheque entries and registered sale deeds; failure of the assessee to specifically seek cross examination at reassessment foreclosed a later natural justice challenge. The impounded documents were treated as reliable corroborative evidence rather than vague papers, and the existence of substantial disparity between recorded and apparent market value reinforced inference of on money. On these grounds the assessing officer's addition as unaccounted sale consideration was held justified and the claim against reassessment failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.