Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Quashing of the administrative order was ordered subject to the petitioner depositing the full contested liability within two weeks as an undertaking; the authority must thereafter provide an opportunity of hearing, consider the petitioner's reply and written submissions, and undertake fresh adjudication. The court set aside the impugned Order-in-Original and permitted the petition partly, with the deposited amount to be refunded or adjusted as appropriate after the re-adjudication. The relief granted was conditional on the undertaking to deposit and did not preclude remand for fresh decision-making.
Quashing of the administrative order was ordered subject to the petitioner depositing the full contested liability within two weeks as an undertaking; the authority must thereafter provide an opportunity of hearing, consider the petitioner's reply and written submissions, and undertake fresh adjudication. The court set aside the impugned Order-in-Original and permitted the petition partly, with the deposited amount to be refunded or adjusted as appropriate after the re-adjudication. The relief granted was conditional on the undertaking to deposit and did not preclude remand for fresh decision-making.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
