Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
Condonation of delay in receipt of export remittance under the CGST framework requires a reasoned order and opportunity for hearing; a mere communication or intimation cannot substitute for an order. The impugned communication purportedly rejecting the petitioner's representation was not a reasoned order and no hearing was afforded. The matter is remitted to the competent commissioner to reconsider the condonation request afresh, afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, and pass a reasoned decision addressing the grounds raised by the petitioner.
Condonation of delay in receipt of export remittance under the CGST framework requires a reasoned order and opportunity for hearing; a mere communication or intimation cannot substitute for an order. The impugned communication purportedly rejecting the petitioner's representation was not a reasoned order and no hearing was afforded. The matter is remitted to the competent commissioner to reconsider the condonation request afresh, afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, and pass a reasoned decision addressing the grounds raised by the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.