Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Condonation of delay in receipt of export remittance under the CGST framework requires a reasoned order and opportunity for hearing; a mere communication or intimation cannot substitute for an order. The impugned communication purportedly rejecting the petitioner's representation was not a reasoned order and no hearing was afforded. The matter is remitted to the competent commissioner to reconsider the condonation request afresh, afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, and pass a reasoned decision addressing the grounds raised by the petitioner.
Condonation of delay in receipt of export remittance under the CGST framework requires a reasoned order and opportunity for hearing; a mere communication or intimation cannot substitute for an order. The impugned communication purportedly rejecting the petitioner's representation was not a reasoned order and no hearing was afforded. The matter is remitted to the competent commissioner to reconsider the condonation request afresh, afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, and pass a reasoned decision addressing the grounds raised by the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.