Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5081 to 5100 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Petitioner, a non-resident US company, sought a withholding-tax certificate. The court held on prima facie review that services described as Matching Solution qualify for issuance of a NIL-rate withholding certificate and directed the competent authority to issue such certificate for the current and subsequent years within prescribed timelines; the authority may later revoke or refuse if it records a finding of Permanent Establishment or taxable transactions in India after issuing notice. For the separate Support Services agreement the court directed withholding to continue for the year and left substantive determination for appropriate proceedings. Annual full-disclosure by petitioner required.
Petitioner, a non-resident US company, sought a withholding-tax certificate. The court held on prima facie review that services described as Matching Solution qualify for issuance of a NIL-rate withholding certificate and directed the competent authority to issue such certificate for the current and subsequent years within prescribed timelines; the authority may later revoke or refuse if it records a finding of Permanent Establishment or taxable transactions in India after issuing notice. For the separate Support Services agreement the court directed withholding to continue for the year and left substantive determination for appropriate proceedings. Annual full-disclosure by petitioner required.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.